He has now replied back a second time, enclosing a reply from Mr Goodwin.
What's interesting is Stephen Hepburn's (Labour) comments about Labour prioritising cycling in three key areas. Infrastructure, safety and training.
@TimBeasley101 Hi Tim, we put the markings in place following local concerns to help keep cyclists safe. Thanks
— DurhamCountyCouncil (@DurhamCouncil) September 9, 2014
A closer look at the markings giving driveways priority over people cycling. Why? just why? |
This is a view of the above kerb from the path. Not very person friendly at all. |
Still some work to do northbound, but it still gives priority to private drives over cyclists. Also the cycleway has give way markings where it joins the road just before a bus stop (increasing risk of conflict). Previously there was a painted lane which has disappeared in favoure for 2 exit lanes, and now starts a few hundred metres further up. Could they not have linked up? |
"They're taking us for a ride"
"If they're cycling during the working day they're already being paid"
"It costs nothing to run a bike"
The last 24 hours have seen cycling safety in the spotlight from a couple of normally driver centric sources.
Firstly Top Gear did a piece on making a public information film about cycling safety.
Since TG had basically morphed into last of the summer wine with 3 old blokes posing about for cheap and obvious laughs, I didn't expect much. It turned out to be even lazier and more unfunny. It reminded me of the last, cheap , casual racist and sexist bullying humour of the 70/80s. The BBC should have amount higher editorial standards.
The saddest thing seems not to be that the Neanderthals that revere Clarkson as a god will (and are) hanging on any and all of the negative points raised, but that so many people on cycling forms such as road.cc and bikeradar thought that some good points were all raised.
With fellow cyclists thinking that, we don't need enemies.
The second is the announcement of the AAs bike safety campaign which will be officially launched this Friday, so this may be premature.
The pre launch information revolves around the idea of stickers given away for car mirrors.
Unless there's more this, like TG, misses the point, as mirror stickers won't guard against actions such as passing dangerously close, or left hooking people on bikes,
I applaud the AA for taking positive action, but I just fear that it's missing the main areas of danger to cyclists from drivers.
The campaign also seems to suggest that it will have the recommendation that cyclists need to adhere to the highway code, falling into the lazy stereotype we've come to expect that all drivers are saints and anybody on a bike is a scofflaw, when in fact it's usually the opposite, with virtually all success anything they habitually breaking the law.
Currently awaiting a cyclist seen on the M25 between 12 & 13. CCTV watching him on the hard shoulder. Should be with me very soon
— Surrey Roads Police (@SurreyRoadCops) February 25, 2014
Shortest route home by bike? Don't rely on the Sat-Nav! Cyclist stopped on M25...yes really: http://t.co/CaX5CoJXfz http://t.co/rE4DrIJklM
— Surrey Roads Police (@SurreyRoadCops) February 25, 2014